Allowed

Arbind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2021CR. MISC./32803/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an excise case involving recovery of alcohol and sugarcane juice, directing compliance with bond conditions within a specified timeframe.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond; surrender within twelve weeks; furnish Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties upon normalcy.

Arbind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Vs The… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32803 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arbind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar S/O Hemant Sahni Resident Of Village Bakhtiyarpur Basantpatti, Ward No 10, P.S.CHAKMEHSI, District-Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Meena Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Excise case No.62/21 registered under Sections 30(a)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that 15 liters wine and 400 liters sugarcane juice are recovered.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32803 of 2021(2) dt.02-09-2021 2/3

¶18

petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case as the alleged recovery is made from the field belonging to the joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 15 liters wine and 400 liters sugarcane juice are recovered from the field belonging to the joint family of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cumSpecial Judge, Samastipur in connection with Excise case No.62/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32803 of 2021(2) dt.02-09-2021 3/3

¶23

furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶24

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶25

Narendra/-

¶26

U T

Arbind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Nath @ Jaikant Yadav @ Prem Nath Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Irfan Khan Vs the State of Bihar

Vidyanand Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Gunjan Kumar @ Gunjan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Ram Sahni @ Shreeram Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Mandal Vs the State of Bihar