The High Court of Patna issued a typographical correction in a pending order, clarifying that the petitioner is named in the FIR, and then consigned the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29117 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-529 Year-2020 Thana- FATUA District- Patna
======================================================
RAJEEV RANJAN @ RAJEEV KUMAR Son of Sri Anil Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh Resident of Sotichak, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satyabir Bharti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
6 09-12-2021
This case has been listed under the heading ‘To be Mentioned’ on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner as he has found some typing error in the order.
In the last para of one of the order dated 30.11.2021, it
has been noted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR whereas the petitioner is named in the FIR. This sentence should be read as ‘the petitioner is named in the FIR’ and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.
With the aforesaid modification, this application is
consigned.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
sanjeev/-
U T
Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Kumar
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
