COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
Permission to withdraw the bail application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16548 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2020 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
======================================================
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party
| ============== Appearance : For the Petitioners |
=========== : Mr. Mr. |
============================= Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate Sharad Kumar Verma, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the State | : Mr. |
Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP |
| For the Informant ============== |
: Mr. =========== |
T. N. Singh, Advocate ============================= |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 230 of 2020, registered for the offence under Sections 498-A, 304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this bail application as the petitioners have been arrested.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
pawan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
What course to take in an anticipatory bail application when the petitioners have been arrested?
Wasir Ansari @ Shabir Ansari
Fulaini Khatoon
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
