Allowed

Gaya Ram @ Gama Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jun 2021CR. MISC./2860/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in an NDPS case where ganja, smack, and cash were recovered from his house. Court granted bail considering recovered quantity was less than small quantity, no incriminating material from conscious possession, and mandatory search and seizure provisions not followed.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Kaimur.

Gaya Ram @ Gama Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2860 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2020 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gaya Ram @ Gama Ram Son O Flate Lal Bahadur Ram R/O Of VillageGorasara, P.S.-Ramgarh, District-Kaimur At Bhabhua.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 14-06-2021

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8/20b(ii)(A)/21(A) of the NDPS Act.

¶11

As per the prosecution case, 600 gram Ganja, 2.84 grams of Smack/heroin along with cash of Rs.28500/- were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a handicapped person and no incriminating material has been recovered from his conscious possession.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2860 of 2021(3) dt.14-06-2021 2/3

¶14

More so, alleged narcotic substances were less than the small quantity. Mandatory provision regarding search and seizure has not been followed. Rigours of section 37 of the NDPS Act is also not attracted against the petitioner who is in custody since 6.8.2020.

¶15

Considering the rival submissions of the parties coupled with the fact that the alleged recovery is less than the small quantity and no allegation of tampering with the evidence against the petitioner let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua in NDPS case no. 23 of 2020 arising out of Chainpur Police Station Case No. 169 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

¶16

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶17

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2860 of 2021(3) dt.14-06-2021 3/3

¶19

for cancellation of bail.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

Shashi

¶22

U T

Gaya Ram @ Gama Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaya Ram @ Gama Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Kamil Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rambilash Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Jaiswal @ Pappu Jaiswal @ Dinesh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Ghanshyam Patel Alias Ghanshyam Patel Vs The State of Bihar