Partly allowed

Saurav Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Feb 2021CR. MISC./28002/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court disposed of an application filed by petitioners in a criminal case involving illicit liquor production. Leave to withdraw was granted for some petitioners already apprehended. Bail was granted to petitioner No. 4 upon furnishing a bond before the court below.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn for petitioners 1, 2, 3, and 5. Petitioner No. 4 granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties to A.S.J.-II-cum-S.J., Excise Act, Begusarai within four weeks.

Saurav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28002 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2020 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SAURAV KUMAR S/o Arun Rai Resident of Village-Basudeopur, P.S.Muffasil, District-Begusarai.

¶5

Arun Rai S/o Gendhari Rai Resident of Village-Basudeopur, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Begusarai.

¶6

Madan Rai S/o Gendhari Rai Resident of Village-Basudeopur, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Begusarai.

¶7

Kundan Kumar S/o Arun Rai Resident of Village-Basudeopur, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Begusarai.

¶8

Pawan Kumar S/o Ashok Rai Resident of Village-Basudeopur, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P.

¶14

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 08-02-2021

¶17

As prayed for, let the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office vide its notes dated 19.10.2020, within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application filed on behalf of the petitioner Nos. (1) Saurav Kumar, (2) Arun Rai, (3) Madan Rai and (5) Pawan Kumar, as they have already been apprehended by the Police.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28002 of 2020(2) dt.08-02-2021 2/3

¶20

In view of the above, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner Nos. (1) Saurav Kumar, (2) Arun Rai, (3) Madan Rai and (5) Pawan Kumar, is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner No. 4 Kundan Kumar and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶22

The petitioner No.4 Kundan Kumar apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 173 of 2020, registered under Section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶23

The accusation is that in course of patrolling duty, the informant and other Police personnel received information to the effect that in the orchard of Janardan Rai, situated in village-Basudeopur, several persons are indulged in preparing the illicit liquor, thereafter, informant along with other Police personnel reached there. On seeing the Police party, several persons succeeded to flee away along with apparatus and utensils from the orchard. On search, 18 litres of country made liquor, kept in two containers, recovered. On inquiry, name of five persons, including the petitioners, came in light, who were indulged in preparing of illicit liquor.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner No.4 Kundan Kumar submits that it would appear from the F.I.R.

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28002 of 2020(2) dt.08-02-2021 3/3

¶26

that petitioner was not apprehended on the spot, rather, his name came in course of inquiry made by the informant. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶27

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner No.4, namely, Kundan Kumar, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 173 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶28

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶29

manish/-

¶30

U T

Saurav Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurav Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bumbum Kumar @ Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Heera Sahni @ Hira Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Ganesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Niraj Vs The State of Bihar

Shushila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Amrawati Devi Vs The State of Bihar