Allowed

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Mar 2021CR. MISC./23336/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving assault and theft, subject to a surety bond of Rs. 50,000 and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., citing a joint compromise petition.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties.

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23336 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2019 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh, aged about 60 years, Male, Son of Late Ram Raj Yadav

¶5

Balwant Kumar, aged about 22 years, Male, son of Hardeep Yadav

¶6

Laloo Yadav @ Shankar Kumar Singh @ Shankar Kumar, aged about 24 years, Male, son of Hardeep Yadav All resident of Village-Lasari, P.S.-Agiawan, District-Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr.Manoranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Uma Nath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 22-03-2021

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No.154 of 2019 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶18

The allegation against the petitioners and others is that they assaulted the informant side in connection with dispute for loading sand from Ghat of the informant. Learned counsel for

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23336 of 2020(3) dt.22-03-2021 2/2

¶20

the petitioners with reference to Annexure-3 would submit that the parties have settled the dispute and they have submitted a joint compromise petition. It is submitted that the offence is non-bailable but Annexure-3 is relevant for the purpose of bail.

¶21

Considering the compromise petition (Annexure-3) for the purpose of bail, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let petitioners, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. P.K. Malviya, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 154 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶23

BT/-

¶24

U T

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Iqbal Vs the State of Bihar

Anil Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Pandey Vs The Chief Election Commissioner in Election of India

Manohar Pandey Vs Chairman cum Managing Director