Allowed

Mosim Ansari @ Md. Mosim Ansari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Mar 2021CR. MISC./2312/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to two petitioners arrested in connection with criminal breach of trust and IT Act offences. The court imposed a bond and specific conditions regarding sureties, attendance, and cooperation with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions of attendance and cooperation.

Mosim Ansari @ Md. Mosim Ansari Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39943 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ataul Ansari @ Aataul Ansari, Male, aged about 33 years, S/o Md. Kudus Ansari, R/o Village/Mohalla- Pathuria, P.S.- Govindpur, District- Dhanbad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with

¶11

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2312 of 2021

¶12

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Mosim Ansari @ Md. Mosim Ansari, aged about 18 years, Male, son of Md. gul Mohammad Ansari, Resident of Village- Pithuriya (Pithauriya), P.S. Govindpur, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand)

¶15

Bashir Ansari, aged about 30 years, Male, son of Ajimuddin Ansari, Resident of Village- Jangalpur, P.S.- Govindpur, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶20

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 39943 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2312 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶21

3 23-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶22

A.P.P. for the State.

¶23

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 276 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39943 of 2020(3) dt.23-03-2021 2/3

¶25

under Sections 419/420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(c), 66(d) of I.T. Act.

¶26

As per the prosecution case, money of informant has been withdrawn illegally from his account without his knowledge.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 19.03.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No.39902 of 2020. Petitioners are in jail custody since 26.06.2019.

¶28

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail petition.

¶29

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhabhua (Kaimur) in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 276 of 2020, subject to the following conditions :

¶30

(1) One of the bairlors will be their own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

¶31

(2) The petitioners shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39943 of 2020(3) dt.23-03-2021 3/3

¶33

(3) The petitioners shall remain physically present in

¶34

court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶35

(4) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make themselves available and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶36

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶37

Nasimul/-

Mosim Ansari @ Md. Mosim Ansari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mosim Ansari @ Md. Mosim Ansari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamsher Alam @ Md. Shamsher Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Meghan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Bahadur Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nisar @ Misar @ Md. Misar @ Nisar Vs the State of Bihar

Damodar Singh Vs The State of Bihar