Allowed

Santu Rajbanshi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Sept 2021CR. MISC./21653/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants regular bail to the petitioner for his alleged involvement in the manufacture and sale of country liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the special judge excise.

Santu Rajbanshi Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21653 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-596 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTU RAJBANSHI SON OF PARAS RAJBANSHI R/O VILLAGE- JOB, P.S.- RAJAULI, DISTRICT- NAWADA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary I, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 15-09-2021

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶16

As per allegations in the FIR, on a raid being conducted, 30 litres of country liquor, utensils and machines used for manufacture of liquor were recovered and three accused persons including the petitioner were taken into custody.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He has no concern with the recovered article nor with the place of recovery. He is in custody since 30.12.2020

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21653 of 2021(2) dt.15-09-2021 2/2

¶19

and has no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case.

¶20

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the period in custody and the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rajaoli P.S. Case no. 596 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Nawada.

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶23

Prakash/-

¶24

Santu Rajbanshi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santu Rajbanshi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raushan Kumar Singh @ Tonu Singh Vs The State of BIhar

Dhanu Ram @ Dhanu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Sah @ Gangadhar Sah @ Gango Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Raju Pandey Vs The State of Bihar