Partly allowed

Md. Tohid @ Md. Tahid @ Tahid Ali v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Mar 2021CR. MISC./19873/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court rejected petitioner no. 1's anticipatory bail application in a criminal case involving assault, police van robbery, and criminal intimidation. Petitioner no. 2's application was dismissed as withdrawn after his arrest. Petitioner no. 1 was advised to surrender for lower court consideration.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw application for Petitioner no. 2; Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected for Petitioner no. 1 with instruction to surrender for lower court decision.

Md. Tohid @ Md. Tahid @ Tahid Ali Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 19873 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2019 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Tohid @ Md. Tahid @ Tahid Ali Son of Md. Rafique, Resident of Village - Belahi, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga.

¶5

Md. Subhan @ Subban Son of Rafique, Resident of Village - Belahi, P.S.Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 03-03-2021

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

counsel for the State.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 2 has been arrested so he wants to withdraw this application with respect to petitioner no. 2.

¶16

Permission is granted and this application is dismissed, as not pressed with respect to petitioner no. 2.

¶17

So far petitioner no. 1, he is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 289 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 352, 308, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

In the present case, allegation has been made that all

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 19873 of 2020(2) dt.03-03-2021 2/2

¶20

the accused persons came and started assaulting the victim.

¶21

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶22

this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner no. 1 and accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner no. 1 surrenders before the court below, the court below without being prejudiced by this order will take decision in accordance with law.

¶23

This order has been passed in presence of Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, learned counsel for the State.

¶24

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶25

Mahesh/-

¶26

U T

Md. Tohid @ Md. Tahid @ Tahid Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Tohid @ Md. Tahid @ Tahid Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Lakhan Rajvanshi Vs The State of Bihar

Lalo Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Sitaram Sharma Vs The State of Bihar