Petitioner withdrew quashing petition with liberty to raise issues at charge framing stage; order disposed but no substantive legal proposition laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18976 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2018 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran
====================================================== MADAN SINGH SON OF LATE INNER SINGH R/O VILLAGEMADHURAPUR, P.S.- PIPRA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 09-12-2021 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the quashing petition with liberty to raise the issues at the time of framing of charge.
Quashing petition is disposed of with the aforesaid
liberty.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
Madan Singh Son of Late Inner Singh
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
