Allowed

Ram Nandan Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2021CR. MISC./35230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail petition filed by the petitioner in a murder case. The petitioner was charged with causing firearm injury but denied killing the deceased. The court released him on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to satisfy C.J.M., Aurangabad.

Ram Nandan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35230 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2020 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Nandan Yadav S/o Late Kangalu Yadav Resident of Village-Fudki Bigha, P.S.-Madanpur, District-Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhaya ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

08-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in Madanpur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 302 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have caused fire-arm injury on the leg of Dhiru Kumar.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is not the assailant of deceased (Navin Kumar). Specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Ramesh Yadav. Petitioner is only alleged to have given fire-arm injury to Dhiru Kumar on his leg. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he is in custody since 04.12.2020.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

¶16

petition.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35230 of 2021(2) dt.08-12-2021 2/2

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2020.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)

¶20

anay

¶21

U T

Ram Nandan Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Nandan Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmeshwar Shukla Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Salim @ Md. Shalim Vs The State of Bihar

Anil @ Mintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Awdhesh Chouhan Vs the State of Bihar

Udaykant Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Sahni @ Sonu Sahni Vs the State of Bihar