Disposed

Sanjay Jha v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Nov 2021CR. MISC./16558/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held the grant of interim bail. Ordered notification of regular bail for the petitioner to be released subject to standard conditions including copy of antecedents, confession, and approved sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directed to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- along with two sureties executing affidavit and compliance with standard bail conditions including antecedent verifi

Sanjay Jha Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16558 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2020 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY JHA SON OF LATE SRIKANT JHA Resident of Village - Parihar, P.S.- Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 23-11-2021

¶12

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, be

¶13

removed within four weeks of start of normal functioning of the physical Court.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.163 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the IPC.

¶17

As per prosecution case, the informant open the door and saw that this petitioner and his son started abusing and assaulted him on his head through axe due to which he fell down and thereafter both of them fled away from the place of occurrence.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16558 of 2021(3) dt.23-11-2021 2/3

¶20

petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that the petitioner and the informant are full brother. There is land dispute between the parties and the petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2020.

¶21

However, learned APP for the State vehementally opposed the prayer for regular bail.

¶22

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, District- Sitamarhi in connection with Parihar P.S. Case no. 163 of 2020 with following conditions:-

¶23

(i) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶24

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(iii) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16558 of 2021(3) dt.23-11-2021 3/3

¶27

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶28

(iv) And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶29

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶30

brajesh kumar/-

Sanjay Jha v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Jha v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalan Kumar Sahi @ Lalan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Anil Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Narayan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Nityanand Chaurasiya @Dablu Chaurasiya Vs The State of Bihar

Bigu Purve @ Mahesh Purve Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar