vehemently, opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that admittedly there is case and counter case between the parties but the petitioner has brutally assaulted the nephew of the informant by means of iron rod, Khanti and butt of the rifle as a result of which he sustained multiple injuries and succumbed before the injuries during course of treatment. In order to supplement his submission, he draws the attention of this Court towards paragraph-6 of the case diary, which is the restatement of the informant, in which, she specifically states that this petitioner gave a fatal blow with Khanti on the head of her nephew (deceased), accordingly, he sustained grievous injuries and fell down. He further refers to paragraphs 7,8,9 and 17 of the case diary, which, according to him, also support the allegation against the petitioner. Coupled with the fact the postmortem report fully corroborates the re-statement of the informant. Hence, the case attracts complicity of Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in this case and the liability lies on the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.
