Dr. Rajan Raj @ Dr. Rajan v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14756 of 2021 modifies an earlier order granting anticipatory bail. The Court extends the time limit for the petitioner to deposit Rs. 4,00,000 and hand over jewellery, accepting evidence that these obligations were already fulfilled despite the initial delay.
What did the court decide?
Extension of the time period for depositing Rs. 4,00,000 and handing over jewellery, as the petitioner had already complied with these conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14756 of 2021
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65469 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2019 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna
======================================================
DR. RAJAN RAJ @ DR. RAJAN S/O VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ BIRENDRA PRASAD R/O MOHALLA-KAGZI MOHALLA, P.SSIWAN TOWN, DISTRICT-SIWAN.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- THE STATE OF BIHAR
- MADHUMITA RAI D/O BIJAN KUMAR RAI, W/O DR. RAJAN RAJ R/O MOHALLA-PANDAPARA ROAD, P.S-KOTWALI, DISTRICTJALPAIGURI, STATE-WEST BENGAL, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT FLAT NO.503, MAA BHAGWATI COMPLEX, BORING ROAD INTERSECTION, P.S-SRI KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT-PATNA.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the time period granted to the petitioner to deposit money and hand over jewellery in connection with anticipatory bail conditions should be extended due to compliance with a four-week memoran
If the petitioner has deposited Rs. 4,00,000/- and handed over jewellery, whether delay in doing so within the stipulated time constitutes laches warranting extension of the time frame.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. RAJAN RAJ @ DR. RAJAN S/O VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
- respondent
THE STATE OF BIHAR
- respondent
MADHUMITA RAI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court