Petitioner prayed for withdrawal of an application for anticipatory bail in PS Case No. 88 of 2020. Prayer allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn. Case disposed orally.
Prayer allowed. Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12131 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2020 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani
======================================================
ROHIT KUMAR S/O YOGENDRA TIWARY @ YOGENDRA MISHRA R/O VILL PIROKHAR @ PIRAUKHAR @ PIDRAUKHAR, P.S MADHWAPUR DIST MADHUBANI
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rana Bhupendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the application.
Prayer is allowed. The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
pravinkumar/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the application for anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Kumar
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
