This is an oral order in a criminal appeal where the appellant failed to appear on the date of hearing after multiple adjournments. The high court dismissed the appeal due to non-prosecution. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
The appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.972 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-701 Year-2019 Thana- FATUA District- Patna
======================================================
Kaju Gope Son of Nathun Gop Resident of Village - Nohta, P.s.- Fatuha, Dist.- Patna.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
the appellant. Earlier also, on 05.10.2020, 12.11.2020, 17.12.2020, 15.01.2021 and 19.02.2021, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant.
In view of aforesaid fact, the appeal stands dismissed due to non-prosecution.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)
anay
U T
Kaju Gope
The State of Bihar
Kamlesh Paswan
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
