Allowed

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Kharwar @ Akhilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2021CR. APP (SJ)/118/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the order granting anticipatory bail previously passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. It granted fresh anticipatory bail to the appellants on personal bond subject to furnishing security bonds of Rs. 10,000 each once normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Appellants released on personal bond; directed to deposit Rs. 10,000 each within eight weeks of normalcy.

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Kharwar @ Akhilesh… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.118 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Kharwar @ Akhilesh Singh, aged about 24 years, Male, Son of Late Indradeo Singh, Resident of VillageSrikantpur, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Buxar.

¶5

Parmeshwar Singh @ Parmesh Singh @ Parmesh Kharwar, aged about 41 years, Male, Son of Late Indradeo Singh, Resident of Village-Srikantpur, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Buxar.

¶6

Bikash Kumar Singh @ Bikash Singh @ Bikash Kharwar, aged about 19 years, Male, Son of Parmeshwar Singh @ Parmesh Singh @ Parmesh Kharwar, Resident of Village-Srikantpur, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Buxar.

¶7

Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Kuamr @ Rakesh Kharwar, aged about 21 years, Male, Son of Parmeshwar Singh @ Parmesh Singh @ Parmesh Kharwar, Resident of Village-Srikantpur, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Buxar.

¶8

Abhilash Singh @ Abhilash Kumar @ Abhilash Kharwar, aged about 21 years, Male, Son of Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Kharwar @ Akhilesh Singh, Resident of Village-Srikantpur, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Buxar.

... ... Appellants

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P. ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 24-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned

¶16

Special P.P. for the State through Virtual mode.

¶17

The matter relates to grant of anticipatory bail to the appellants in (SC/ST) A.B.P. No. 1195/2019, arising out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 252/2019, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 308, 379, 354(A), 435, 427, 504, 506 of the I.P.C. and 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.118 of 2020(4) dt.24-06-2021 2/3

¶19

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 06.11.2019 at 7 O’clock, in the evening, while the informant was sitting at her door, all the appellants came armed with Lathi, Danda and started to abuse calling her caste name, When the husband of the informant came to rescue her, they have also assaulted him with Lathi causing injury upon his head. Other persons have also received injuries.

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that the appellants have got no criminal antecedent. They have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against them. There is case and counter case between the parties. Injuries on the side of the appellants have not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands. The appellants also belong to SC/ST category. Hence offence under SC/ST Act is not applicable in the present case. In course of investigation, the allegation in respect of SC/ST Act has also been found to be false by the Investigating Officer. The alleged occurrence has not taken place in public view. Hence, no offence under SC/ST Act is attracted in the present case.

¶21

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the appellants are named in the F.I.R.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.118 of 2020(4) dt.24-06-2021 3/3

¶23

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order dated 12.12.2019, passed in (SC/ST) A.B.P. No. 1195/2019, arising out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 252/2019 by learned Additional Sessions Judge Ist-cum-Special Judge, Buxar, is set aside. The criminal appeal is allowed.

¶24

Let the appellants above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge- Ist--cum-Special Judge, Buxar, in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 252/2019.

¶25

Once the normalcy is restored, the appellants shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

U.K./- U T

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Kharwar @ Akhilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar Kharwar @ Akhilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pravesh Bind @ Ram Pravesh Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Gulashan Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhu Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Balmiki Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Kapil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar