Allowed

Prabhu Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jun 2021CR. MISC./12942/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, father-in-law and mother-in-law of a deceased, named in an FIR under sections 304B, 201, and 34 of the IPC alleging torture and dowry demand. They were released on personal bond with conditions to execute surety bonds after normalcy. Subject to conditions under CrPC 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail on personal bond to be executed within 12 weeks, followed by furnishing surety bonds within 8 weeks of normalcy.

Prabhu Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12942 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2020 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRABHU PRASAD Son of Late Ganesh Prasad R/o Village- Lakdi Madhopur, P.S.- Lakdi Nabiganj O.P., District- Siwan.

¶5

Meena Devi W/o- Prabhu Prasad R/o Village- Lakdi Madhopur, P.S.- Lakdi Nabiganj O.P., District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-06-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State through virtual mode.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture and caused death of the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12942 of 2021(2) dt.23-06-2021 2/2

¶18

Nos. 1 & 2 are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased respectively. They are separate in mess and property from husband of the deceased. They have got no concern with the alleged occurrence.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Siwan in connection with Basantpur (Lakdi Nabiganj O.P.) P.S. Case No. 46 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioners shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

A.K.V.//-

¶24

U T

Prabhu Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhu Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poonam Devi @ Priya Verma @ Priya Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjeet Patel @ Ranjeet Kumar Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Baudhu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Bind @ Ram Pravesh Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Gulashan Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Sukumari Devi Vs the State of Bihar