Allowed

Chhotu Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2021/30771/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous application, the High Court of Judicature at Patna, via an oral order, granted regular bail to the petitioner charged with offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The court relied on the investigation material and the petitioner's ten-month custody duration.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case no. 93 of 2019 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Chhotu Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30771 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2019 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

CHHOTU SINGH @ DHIRAJ KUMAR SINGH Son of Jitendra Singh Resident of Village - Chakua, P.S. Kutumba, District - Aurangabad, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 17-12-2021

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶16

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 376, 341, 342, 448, 511, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the informant that while the informant was alone in her house, the petitioner entered and started to force himself upon her. He assaulted the informant as also struck her with a blade causing injuries on her body.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case which would be evident from the materials on record enclosed with this petition as also the material that has transpired in course of

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30771 of 2021(3) dt.17-12-2021 2/2

¶20

investigation. Further chargesheet has been submitted under sections 354B, 341, 342, 448 , 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 17.2.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶21

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the material that has transpired in course of investigation, chargesheet having been submitted in the case and the petitioner having remained in custody for 10 months, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case no. 93 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad.

¶23

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶24

Spd/-

¶25

U T

Chhotu Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhotu Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vikash Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar and Anr. Vs He State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Food And Consumer Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Babu Sahni Vs The State of Bihar