This court dismissed a civil review petition because interlocutory applications for condonation of limitation and substitution of parties were already dismissed, rendering the review unfit to proceed.
The Civil Review No.230 of 2015 stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.230 of 2015
Arising out of FIRST APPEAL No.344 of 1977
Along with Interlocutory Application No. 8915 of 2015 And Interlocutory Application No. 2999 of 2017 In Civil Review No.230 of 2015
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court C. REV. No.230 of 2015(14) dt.22-01-2020 2/3
U.P.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.230 of 2015(14) dt.22-01-2020 3/3
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamala Kant Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER
14 22-01-2020 Learned counsel for the petitioners is present.
condonation of limitation (IA No. 8915 of 2015) and Interlocutory Application for substitution of the heirs of many of the opposite parties (IA No. 2999 of 2017) having stood dismissed, the Civil Review itself is unfit to proceed. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/-
U
Sheo Dayal Chaudhary
Yogendra Chaudhary
Haridas Chaudhary
Vijay Chaudhary
Santosh Chaudhary
Bhim Chaudhary
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
