Dismissed

Ram Bhajan Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2020CWJC/1294/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petitioner sought demarcation and possession of two decimals of land settled in his favor. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the District Collector to ensure compliance with prior orders for possession within one month.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent no. 2 to ensure respondent no. 4 demarcates and restores possession of the two decimals of land as per Basgit Parcha within one month.

Ram Bhajan Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1294 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Bhajan Singh aged about 59 years, Gender-Male, Son of Late Nirdhan Singh resident of Village- Maheshwara, Police Station Hathouri, DistrictSamastipur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Land Reform Department, Patna.

¶7

The District Collector Cum Sectional Appellate Tribunal, Samastipur.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer Cum Lok Suchana Padhadhikari Rosera, Samastipur.

¶9

The Circle Officer, Shivaji Nagar, Samastipur.

¶10

The Circle Inspector, Shivaji Nagar, Samastipur.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Ban Bihari Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC 19

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶16

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date : 21-01-2020

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned SC 19 for the State.

¶19

The petitioner has moved the Court for the following

¶20

reliefs:

¶21

“1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions particularly in the nature of Mandamus for the following reliefs:-

¶22

(I) For a direction to the respondents to demarcate the land bearing Mauza Maheshwara Thana no. 5 Khata No. 145, Kheshra 344/749 area 2 Decimal in the light of order dated 1.8.2017 passed by respondent no. 3 contained in Annexure-2.

¶23

(ii) For any other relief or reliefs as the Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper.”

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.1294 of 2020 dt.21-01-2020 2/2

¶25

The grievance of the petitioner is that two decimals of land settled with him by issuance of Basgit Parcha , the same be demarcated and possession restored.

¶26

Learned counsel for the State submitted that the authorities have passed orders which support the contention of the petitioner. It was submitted that the direction of the authorities is required to be complied with by the respondent no. 4 and the Court may direct the Collector, Samastipur to ensure such compliance.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the same.

¶28

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to ensure that the direction to the respondent no. 4 to ensure possession of the entire two decimals of land as per Basgit Parcha issued in favour of the petitioner, is carried out to its logical conclusion in accordance with law, latest within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this order before the respondents no. 2 and 4.

¶29

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶30

Anand Kr.

¶31

AFR/NAFR U T

Ram Bhajan Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bhajan Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Husna Khatun Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sumitra Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sakaldeep Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Shahina Khatoon @ Sahina Khatun Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Randhir Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar