Petitioner in a civil review seeking withdrawal of the petition; court treated withdrawal as lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.122 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4568 of 2014
======================================================
Laxman Singh Son of- Late Ram Dayal Ram, R/o Village- Demha, P.O.Bagma, Via- Udbant Nagar, District- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav - Aag 11 : Mr. Sunil Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
petitioner seeks to withdraw the present review petition.
Accordingly, the present review petition stands
dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/-
U
Laxman Singh Son of- Late Ram Dayal Ram
The State Of Bihar
The Engineer in Chief, Road Construction Department, Patna Division, Patna
The Chief Engineer N.H, Road Construction Department, Patna Division, Patna
The Superintending Engineer N.H., Road Construction Department, Patna Division, Patna
The Executive Engineer N.H, Road Construction Department, Patna East Circle, Patna
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
