Disposed

Sarvanand Singh v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Jan 2020MJC/827/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner appealed against an order in a pension promotion matter. The High Court noted the respondent had already complied by granting the requested grade scale and disposed of the application without further proceedings, granting liberty on unredressed grievances.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of; liberty granted to raise unredressed grievances in appropriate forum.

Sarvanand Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.827 of 2019 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1671 of 2016

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sarvanand Singh S/o Late Raju Singh resident of Village- Najirganj, P.O Najirganj, Police Station- Janta Bazar, District- Saran Chapra, retired while working as assistant teacher from Govt. Primary School Keshari Mathiya, Anchal- Ekma-I, District- Saran Chapra.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan,the Principal Secretary,Education Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶8

Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, the Director, Primary Education, Bihar,Patna

¶9

Mr. Subrato Sen, District Magistrate,Saran

¶10

Mr. Jai Chand Srivastava, the District Education Officer,Saran

¶11

Mr. Dileep Kumar Singh, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran

¶12

Mr. Gopi Chand, the District Treasury Officer,Saran at Chapra

¶13

Mr. Ramesh Kumar, the District Accounts Officer,Saran at Chapra

¶14

Mr. Mithilesh Prasad, the Block Education Officer,Ekma-1,Dist.-Saran

¶15

Mr. Dharampal Singh, the Headmaster cum Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Primary School Keshari Mathiya, Anchal- Ekma1.Dist.-Saran(Chapra)

¶16

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Smt. Shilpa Singh (Ga12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶20

4 22-01-2020

¶21

Pursuant to the order dated 18.4.2019 show cause

¶22

has been filed.

¶23

Para-6 to 10 reads as follows:

¶24

“6. That after disposal of the writ application the petitioner represented in the department alongwith the order of the Hon’ble Court. In the representation he has requested for

¶25

Patna High Court MJC No.827 of 2019(4) dt.22-01-2020 2/3

¶26

grant of time bound promotion selection grade scale as per rule 1993. the representation of the petitioner is already on record as Annexure-2 as the same is not brought on record by the deponent.

¶27

That the deponent has recently joined as DP (establishment) Saran on ----just after joining when it came into knowledge of the deponent about compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Court he took steps towards that and disposed the claim of the petitioner by granting him selection grade scale.

¶28

That in anticipation of the meeting of the promotion committee the selection grade scale 5500-75-900 (Grade Pay 4800) as claimed by the petitioner has been granted to him w.e.f. 01.04.2004 through memo no. 1123 dt. 20.04.2019.

¶29

That it is hereby humbly mentioned that for grant of consequential relief to the decision the deponent has sent the copy of the order as contained in Annexure-A to the concerned treasury, District Account Officer and concerned Block Education Officer. The copy has also been sent to the petitioner also.

¶30

That from the fact explained above it is evident that the order of the Hon’ble Court has already been complied by the deponent. Some delay has been committed in compliance of the order that is not deliberate the deponent has recently joined there, there is no delay on his part. The inconvenience caused by it is deeply regretted and the deponent prays for excuse.”

¶31

Patna High Court MJC No.827 of 2019(4) dt.22-01-2020 3/3

¶32

Considering the aforesaid, the Court does not feel inclined to proceed any further in the matter. If any grievance remain unredressed, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to raise the issue in appropriate forum in accordance with law.

¶33

With the aforesaid, the present application stands

¶34

disposed of.

¶35

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶36

Ravi/-

¶37

Sarvanand Singh v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarvanand Singh v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinda Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeev Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Brij Bihary Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kripal Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar