The single judge granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the writ application and dismissed the civil writ petition on those terms.
Permission accorded to withdraw the writ application; writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3033 of 2019
======================================================
Rajeev Ranjan S/o Jodhan Ram R/o-New Yarpur,Janta Road,Kusum Nivas,Gardanibagh,P.S.-Gardanibagh,Dist.-Patna,at present working as Electrician,Contable No.360,Home Gaurds and Fire Services,Chajubagh,Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Partha Sarthy (GA-4) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
3 17-01-2020
Today this case has been listed under the heading “To
Be Mentioned” on oral motion under the order of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the writ application.
Permission is accorded.
The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U
Rajeev Ranjan
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
