Disposed

M/s Muskan Associates v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Sept 2020CWJC/7859/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding public procurement, the petitioner argued that modified tender terms during pendency qualified him to participate. The Court disposed of the petition with liberty to approach respondents for participation under amended terms.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to approach respondents to participate in the tender under amended terms.

M/s Muskan Associates Vs The State of Bihar — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7859 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s Muskan Associates having local office at 302, heera Enclave, New dak Bungalow Road, Patna-800001, through its Proprietor, Mr. Ajit Kumar, aged about 55 Years (Male), Son of Bachchu Prasad resident of Flat No.603, Vasundhara Palace, Ashiyana Digha Road, Patna. Ashiyanagar, Patna-800025.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Home Department (Prisons), Govt. of Bihar.

¶8

¶9

The Inspector General, (Prisons), Govt. of Bihar.

¶10

The Assistant Inspector General (AIG), Prisons and Correctional Services, Govt. of Bihar.

¶11

The Purchase Committee Presided Over by Sri Mithilesh Mishra, Inspector General, Prisons and Correctional Services in NIT No. PCSH/IND/01/202021 dated 20.082020

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Nadim Seraj, Advocate

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 22-09-2020 Heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Nadim Seraj, for the State.

¶18

Mr. Y.C. Verma submits that the respondents have modified the terms and conditions for participating in the tender during the pendency of the writ application. He submits that in view of the changed criteria the petitioner is qualified to participate in the tender process. Hence, direction may be issued to the respondents to issue fresh tender to allow the petitioner to participate in the tender process.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.7859 of 2020(2) dt.22-09-2020 2/2

¶20

In view of the change in the terms and conditions and eligibility to participate in the tender, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents to consider his case for participating in the tender for which he is qualified in terms of the amended terms and conditions for participating in the tender process. The respondents are expected to take appropriate decision in accordance with law in the changed circumstances

¶21

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶22

Ravi/-

¶23

M/s Muskan Associates v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Muskan Associates v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalbabu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Awadh Kishore Prasad Vs Bihar State Minorities Financial Corporation Ltd.

Madhuri Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Uday Shankar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Smt. Nazra Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Vishwakarma Vs The State of Bihar