Disposed

Madhuri Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 Sept 2020CWJC/9098/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition concerning unpaid post-retiral dues. Finding that the dues were already paid to the widow per the respondent's counter-affidavit, a separate forum for verification and succession certificate is prescribed for the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to establish unpaid dues via representation and succession certificate.

Madhuri Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9098 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Madhuri Devi, Wife of late Nawal Kishore Yadav, Resident of VillageAlkajra, P.S. Jhajha, District- Jamui.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, General Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Jamui.

¶11

The District Provident Fund Officer, Jamui.

¶12

The Treasury Officer, Jamui.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Sono, Jamui.

¶14

The Block Development Officer, Jhajha, Jamui.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance :

¶18

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶19

6 21-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

¶20

The petitioner, who is the daughter-in-law of late Lav Prakash Gope, claims that certain post retiral dues have not been paid by the respondents to her late father-in-law, namely, Lav Prakash Gope or the widow of late Lav Prakash Gope, namely, late Chandra Devi.

¶21

In the counter affidavit, statement has been made that entire dues have been paid to Chandra Devi, widow of deceased

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.9098 of 2018(6) dt.21-09-2020 2/2

¶23

employee.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid controversy, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents and establish the case that post-retiral admissible dues of her late father-in-law late Lav Prakash Gope or his widow late Chandra Devi have not been paid by way of filing representation along with a copy of this order.

¶25

On filing such representation, the respondents will examine the claim of the petitioner and if anything is found admissible, the respondents are under obligation to ensure payment of amount only after production of succession certificate with regard to property of late Lav Prakash Gope or late Chandra Devi.

¶26

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

¶27

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶28

uday/-

¶29

Madhuri Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhuri Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Bhathi Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Balak Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sanni Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lalbabu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Awadh Kishore Prasad Vs Bihar State Minorities Financial Corporation Ltd.

Shrikant Sharan Shahi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.