This oral order dismissed a contempt petition by the learned Judge, finding no further action required as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated notices for compensation.
Contempt petition dismissed as no further action is required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4033 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3550 of 2015
======================================================
Ajay Kumar Sahani S/o Late Sukhdeo Sahani Resident of VillageRaghunathpur Imadpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh Ms. Rashmi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate(A.G.) For the N.H.A.I. : Mr. S.N.Pathak, S.C., N.H.A.I.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
By order dated 06.02.2018, the respondent Nos.1 to 5 were directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, as contained in Annexure-3, within four months. The respondents issued notice to the petitioner to appear and receive amount of compensation but in spite of repeated notices, the petitioner did not appear.
Considering the fact, I find that no further action is required. This contempt petition is dismissed.
Saurabh/- U
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Ajay Kumar Sahani
The State Of Bihar
Vinod Kumar
Radha Raman Murari
Dinesh Kumar
Pranay Kumar
PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
