Petitioner sought to quash an ex parte assessment order under the Bihar Entry Tax Act. Counsel for the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Prayer for withdrawal allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2596 of 2017
======================================================
S. S. Briks, Aurangabad, a proprietorship firm, having its office at VillageSanathua, P.O. Yogiya, P.S. Rishiyap, District Aurangabad through its Proprietor Shri Satyendra Narayan Singh, Resident of Village- Sanathua, P.O. Yogiya, P.S. Rishiyap, District Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satyabir Bharti, Advocate Ms. Prachi Pallavi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 16-12-2020
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):
“i) Issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order, dated 24.08.2016, passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad, by which an ex parte order of assessment has been passed against the petitioner under section 8 of the Bihar Entry Tax Act, 1993 read with section 28(1) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the assessment year 2015-16 assessing the petitioner for payment of
Patna High Court CWJC No.2596 of 2017 dt.16-12-2020
2/2
Entry Tax of Rs.20,000.00 and penalty of Rs.51200.00 on account of nonpayment of entry tax for 512 days;
ii) Quashing and setting aside the consequential demand notice, dated 24.8.2016, by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.71,200.00;
iii) To pass such other order(s) as your lordships may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the petition.
Prayer allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
K.C.Jha/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| Uploading Date | 21.12.2020 |
| Transmission Date |
S. S. Briks
State Of Bihar
The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes
Sanjay Karol
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
