Petitioner sought quashing of an ex parte assessment order and demand notice under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act. The Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Prayer to withdraw the petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2344 of 2017
======================================================
S. S. Briks, Aurangabad, a proprietorship firm, having its office at VillageSanathua, P.O. Yogiya, P.S. Rishiyap, District Aurangabad through its Proprietor Shri Satyendra Narayan Singh, Resident of Village- Sanathua, P.O. Yogiya, P.S. Rishiyap, District Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satyabir Bharti, Advocate Ms. Prachi Pallavi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC 11 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 16-12-2020
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):
“i) Issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order, dated 24.08.2016, passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad, by which an ex parte order of assessment has been passed against the petitioner under section 31 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the assessment year 2015-16 assessing the petitioner for payment
Patna High Court CWJC No.2344 of 2017 dt.16-12-2020
2/2
of VAT of Rs. 206000.00;
ii) Quashing and setting aside the consequential demand notice, dated 24.8.2016, by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.185,000.00 upon adjusting the admitted tax already paid by the petitioner;
iii) To pass such other order(s) as your lordships may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the petition.
Prayer allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
K.C.Jha/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 21.12.2020 Transmission Date
S. S. Briks
The State Of Bihar
The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna
The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad
The Commercial Tax Officer, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad
Chief Justice Sanjay Karol
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
