Councilor, who is petitioner in CWJC No. 16606 of 2019, detailed reasons have been mentioned and, thus, she was aware of the same and such plea of non-communication of the reasons is not tenable. However, on a specific query of the Court that when such requisition to the then Chief Councilor, no copy having been marked to the Deputy Chief Councilor and the special meeting convened for the purpose of considering the No Confidence against both the persons, how the same can be deemed to satisfy the requirement of the statute, learned counsel could not controvert the fact that no copy containing reasons was ever served on the then Deputy Chief Councilor. Further, on a specific query of the Court with regard to law settled in Meena Yadav (supra) which supports the contentions of the petitioners, which mandatorily requires notice to all the Ward Councilors to be accompanied with the reasons/grounds/charges levelled, admittedly not being complied with, learned counsel fairly submitted that the law once having been settled by the Court, the consequences would follow. Learned counsel could also not justify the change of date of the meeting by the Executive Officer of the Nagar Panchayat from 02.08.2019 to 13.08.2019.
