The Patna High Court permitted the withdrawal of the criminal writ application filed by the petitioner challenging a revisional order dismissing a complaint case, granting liberty to seek alternative remedies.
Writ application permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to seek remedy if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.177 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14348 Year-2014 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai
======================================================
Ajay Kumar Poddar S/o Late Nageshwar Poddar resident of Village - Kiul Gadhara, P.S. - Barauni, District - Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate Mr.Sadanand Deo Prasad, Advocate For the Res. No. 2 & 5 : Mr.Dinesh Maharaj, Advocate For the Res. No. 4 : Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
Although, the petitioner has challenged the revisional order dated 26.09.2016 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Criminal Revision No. 356 of 2016 whereby learned Sessions Judge has refused to interfere with the order of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai passed in Complaint Case No. 14348(C)/14 dismissing the complaint case
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.177 of 2017(6) dt.25-02-2020 2/2
filed by the petitioner, after some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ application with liberty to seek his remedy, if any, available to him for the alleged damages caused to him by illegal acts and omissions of the respondents.
The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. It is always open for the petitioner to seek his remedy as may be advised to him in accordance with law.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
arvind/ved
U T
Ajay Kumar Poddar
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Singh Gaur
Shushil Kumar
Ram Balak Paswan
Rakesh Kumar Poddar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
