Dismissed

Santosh Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Feb 2020CR. REV./291/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal revision concerned with an N.D.P.S. case, the Patna High Court dismissed the petition challenging the impugned order. The Court found no plausible reason to interfere as the relied-upon school certificate was not an admitted document due to the Principal's report stating its absence, and other documents confirmed the petitioner's age as 24 years.

What did the court decide?

The application challenging the impugned order dated 04.12.2018 is dismissed.

Santosh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.291 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2016 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Prasad Son of Sri Shankar Prasad R/o Village Bhelwa, P.O and P.SChhauradano, District- East Champaran, Motihari.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

The Union of India through Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna Bihar

¶9

... ... Respondents

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sharda nand Mishra, Advocate Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the UOI : None ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 24-02-2020 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. None appears for the Union of India.

¶15

Petitioner in the present case has assailed the order dated 04.12.2018 passed by learned 7^th Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari in N.D.P.S. Case No. 66 of 2016 arising out of NCB/PZU/CRIME No. 08/2016.

¶16

Although, learned Senior Counsel has assailed the impugned order but on going though the same it appears that the school certificate on which the petitioner is placing reliance is not an admitted document as the Incharge Principal of the said

¶17

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.291 of 2019(5) dt.24-02-2020 2/2

¶18

school has submitted his report that there is no document regarding the school leaving certificate produced by the petitioner. In absence of the same the medical examination report of the petitioner and the other documents such as voter identity card has been found mentioning his age at 24 years.

¶19

This Court finds no plausible reason to interfere with the impugned order. No case for interference is made out.

¶20

This application is dismissed.

¶21

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶22

arvind/ved

¶23

U T

Santosh Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate, Araria and Ors.

Sudama Kumar Vs the State of Bihar through Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Khushbu Kumari @ Khushbu @ Ujala Devi Vs Anand Kumar @ Anand Murti @ Tutu

Meena Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General Of Police D. G. P. , Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Dinesh Kumar Pandey @ Dinesh Pandey Vs The State of Bihar