Allowed

Buchun Chaudhary @ Buchan Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jun 2020CR. MISC./9389/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nauhatta Bench allowed bail to the petitioner, who was already in custody, pending trial for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, and 504 IPC, citing the duration of custody and trial delays due to Covid-19.

What did the court decide?

Relinquishment of the petitioner on provision of bail bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of the like amount, or personal bond if sureties are unavailable due to lockdown.

Buchun Chaudhary @ Buchan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9389 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2018 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BUCHUN CHAUDHARY @ BUCHAN CHAUDHARY Son of Late Rampyare Chaudhary @ Rampyari Chaudhary Resident of Village- Ulli, P.S.Nauhatta, District- Rohtas .... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Siddharth Harsh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 05-06-2020

¶7

The matter has been taken up through video conferencing.

¶8

Heard the parties.

¶9

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

The petitioner allegedly caused injury with tangi at the cheek of the younger brother of the informant, during occurrence of assault.

¶11

Earlier prayer for bail to the petitioner was refused by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 05.07.2019. Petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2019.

¶12

Considering the nature of allegation and period already undergone by the petitioner as well as no chance of conclusion of the trial in near future due to Covid-19 affects,

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9389 of 2020(3) dt.05-06-2020 2/2

¶14

let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No.125 of 2019 (CIS No.125 of 2019) arising out of Nauhatta Police Station Case No.131 of 2018 with following conditions:

¶15

(a) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶16

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶17

¶18

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

¶19

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶20

Nitesh/- U T

Buchun Chaudhary @ Buchan Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Buchun Chaudhary @ Buchan Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Danish Vs The State of Bihar

Natha Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Ganesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bhimal Yadav @ Vimal Yadav Vs the State of Bihar