Allowed

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jun 2020CR. MISC./19257/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for liquor possession under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court noted the investigation was complete and the petitioner had no prior record.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties; provisional release on personal bond allowed due to lockdown.

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19257 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2020 Thana- LODIPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRADEEP YADAV @ PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV Son of Baraf Lal Yadav Resident of Village-Nunajor, P.S.-Mahgama, District-Godda (Jharkhand).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP.

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-06-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

¶14

Let the defects be removed within two weeks of the start of the physical court.

¶15

Heard the parties.

¶16

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

Liquor was allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2020. Petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent. Investigation of the case is already complete.

¶18

Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19257 of 2020(2) dt.04-06-2020 2/2

¶20

bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2020 with following conditions:

¶21

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶22

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶23

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

¶24

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶25

mantreshwar/-

¶26

U T

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Danish Vs The State of Bihar

Natha Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Banta Paswan @ Banata Paswan Vs the State of Bihar