Allowed

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jun 2020CR. MISC./87446/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner in custody for firearms and excise offences sought bail renewal as trial concluded was pending beyond six months. Court granted bail on ₹20,000 with two sureties subject to standard conditions including territorial residency and cooperation with trial.

What did the court decide?

Order granting bail to the petitioner on ₹20,000 with two sureties each of ₹20,000 subject to specified conditions.

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharo Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87446 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ DHARO YADAV S/O Shambhu Yadav Resident of Village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- S. Kamal, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Veena Rani Prasad, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-06-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

¶11

Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offence punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 37(B) and 37(C) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Allegation is that from possession of the petitioner, fire arm along with cartridges were recovered. Petitioner has got criminal antecedent. Earlier prayer for bail was refused on 12.06.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 23573 of 2019 considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 07.01.2019.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87446 of 2019(2) dt.10-06-2020 2/2

¶15

While refusing the prayer for bail, this Court had directed the trial Judge to expedite the trial with liberty to the petitioner to renew prayer for bail after six months, if the trial is not concluded in the meantime.

¶16

Submission is that the trial has not yet concluded.

¶17

Considering the period already undergone by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019 with following conditions:

¶18

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶19

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶20

¶21

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶22

mantreshwar/- U T

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjun Das Vs The State of Bihar

Sanoj Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Rai @ Sonu Kumar Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Satish Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhikhar Rai @ Bhikhari Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Nishant Kumar @ Amit Singh @ Nishant Vs the State of Bihar