Allowed

Md. Sattar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Feb 2020CR. MISC./86484/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail for two petitioners accused of offences under sections 147, 341, 342, 435, 332, and 506 of the IPC. They were required to furnish bail bonds and adhere to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties subject to conditions.

Md. Sattar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86484 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-638 Year-2017 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Sattar Son of Late Jaan Mohammad (Representative of Ward Member No.13) resident of Village-Rampur Uttar, Ward No.13, P.S-Forbesganj, District-Araria.

¶5

Md. Ibrar @ Md. Ibrar Alam @ Md. Abrar Alam Son of Late Md. Alauddin (Sarpanch) resident of Village-Rampur Uttar, Ward No.12, P.S.-Forbesganj, District-Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 24-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No.638 of 2017 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 341, 342, 435, 332, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation has been made, on account of demand of flood relief, 50-60 male and female members blocked the road and disturbed the movement of traffic. The police official went there and removed the road from block.

¶15

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶16

the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86484 of 2019(2) dt.24-02-2020 2/2

¶18

event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No.638 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

¶19

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶20

Mahesh/-

¶21

U T

Md. Sattar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Sattar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gorelal Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Byahut Vs The State of Bihar

Rambabu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kishan Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Gandhi @ Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar