Allowed

Chandan Kumar Byahut v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Feb 2020CR. MISC./86270/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving affray and hurt. The petitioner must surrender within six weeks, furnish bail bonds with sureties, and appear for police investigation. Absenteeism may lead to cancellation.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail to appear for investigation within six weeks within a period of two months, on conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Chandan Kumar Byahut Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86270 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan

¶3

====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR BYAHUT, aged about 23 years, Gender-Male, S/o Late Rama Shankar Byahut, R/o village- Maghar, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, DistrictSiwan.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar. 2. The South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Parties

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 20-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶10

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 252 of 2019, registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 353, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Allegation has been made that the petitioner has entered into the office of the Electricity Department and started abusing the Government servants. When the Executive Assistant asked him not to behave in such a manner, he took out knife and caused injury to him.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86270 of 2019(2) dt.20-02-2020 2/2

¶14

alleged incident has taken place on 21.06.2019 but, the F.I.R. has been lodged on 16.07.2019 i.e. after about 25 days that too without any explanation.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case no.252 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.

¶16

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶17

pawan/-

¶18

U T

Chandan Kumar Byahut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar Byahut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Rai @ Chhotu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Babu @ Ram Babu Saw Vs the State of Bihar through the Vigilance Bihar, Patna

Gorelal Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rambabu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Karim Sai @ Karim Sah Vs The State of Bihar