Dismissed

Umesh Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2020CR. MISC./82115/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This anticipatory bail petition arising from a cheating case related to examination malpractice was rejected. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks to seek regular bail. The High Court declined to grant anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected. Direction to surrender before trial court within four weeks for regular bail.

Umesh Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82115 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1166 Year-2014 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

UMESH KUMAR RAM Son of Late Bishundayal Ram Resident of Village - Siwan, P.O. - Dhanej, P.S.- Karaghar, Distt - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party.

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Kanhaiya Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 25-06-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sasaram Town P.S. Case No.1166 of 2014 registered under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶15

The accusation is that in the Examination of History- 4^th Paper (Group-B) of B.A. Part-III, 2014 at the Examination Centre, in place of this petitioner, one Vikash was found sitting, who disclosed that he is sitting in the said examination in place of his brother (petitioner), who had gone to Gujarat to appear in the Examination.

¶16

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82115 of 2019(3) dt.25-06-2020 2/2

¶18

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

¶19

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶20

P.S./-

¶21

U T

Umesh Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Chaudhary @ Santosh Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Shad @ Shankar Sada @ Hari Om @ Hari Om Sada @ Shanker Sada Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar @ Badan Rai @ Arun Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ranvijay Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Bhuwar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar