Allowed

Arun Kumar @ Badan Rai @ Arun Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2020CR. MISC./82056/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2019. The Court granted bail upon surrender/arrest within four weeks, requiring a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC, noting the alleged offence's basis on suspicion and the complainant's son's prior involvement in other cases.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon surrender/arrest within four weeks, to furnish bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each to the ACJM, Danapur.

Arun Kumar @ Badan Rai @ Arun Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82056 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2019 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARUN KUMAR @ BADAN RAI @ ARUN RAI, aged about 40 years, Male, Son of Late Sukhari Rai, Resident of Village- Tillu Tola (Sadisopur), P.S.Naubatpur, District- Patna, at present Nearby Sadisopur Railway Station- P.S.Bihta, District- Patna ... Petitioner

¶5

The State of Bihar ================	=========	Versus ... Opposite Party =============================
Appearance : For the Petitioner	: Mr.	Bhim Kumar Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party ================	: Mr. =========	Uday Pratap Singh, APP =============================

¶6

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 24-06-2020

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing.

¶11

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2019, registered under Sections 364 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The accusation is that in the first week of September, 2018, petitioner, Arun Kumar, came at the house of complainant/informant, Kameshwar Rai, and asked his son, Arvind Kumar, aged about 18 years, to do the work of labourer on the wage of Rs.500/- per day, thereafter, his son, Arvind Kumar, moved with the petitioner. On 11.09.2018 Arvind Kumar came on motorcycle with a boy, Kambuchha, then, petitioner became anger and told that he had engaged him to do

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82056 of 2019(4) dt.24-06-2020 2/3

¶14

the work and not for moving here-and-there. At that time, hot talk exchanged with the petitioner and his son, Arvind Kumar. Later on, on much persuasion, Arvind Kumar went to do the work of the petitioner. On 14.09.2018 the petitioner asked Arvind Kumar to go to do the work at Shankarpur Diara Balughat, where Kambuchha and Mohan Rai called him. When informant made query about his son, no satisfactory reply was given to him, then, the informant went to Shankarpur Balughat, but, no trace was found. On query, petitioner informed that all the labourers will come in the evening, but, in evening when labourers returned, his son was not with them. The informant had given the written complaint at Police Station, Naubatpur, but, no action was taken, then, he is filing the complaint in the Court.

¶15

Submission is that it would appear from the first information report, which is based on complaint petition, and the case diary, which is upto paragraph 25 that mere on suspicion, the informant has lodged the present case against the petitioner and two others. In fact, Arvind Kumar, son of the complainant/informant, Kameshwar Rai, is accused in Bihta P.S. Case No. 664 of 2017 registered under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and Bihta P.S. Case No. 665 of

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82056 of 2019(4) dt.24-06-2020 3/3

¶17

2017 registered under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and there is possibility of killing of Arvind Kumar, but, taking the advantage of missing of the son, the informant lodged the complaint case on 15.05.2019, after six months of the occurrence, which is the basis of the first information report. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of surrender/arrest, within a period of four weeks from today, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2019 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, II, Danapur, Patna, or the successor Court subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Criminal Procedure Code.

¶19

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶20

Shamshad/-

¶21

U T

Arun Kumar @ Badan Rai @ Arun Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Kumar @ Badan Rai @ Arun Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajay Dom Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Babuchand Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sonu Nat Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Chaudhary @ Santosh Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar