Allowed

Mahendra Saw v. Union of India through Dhiraj Kumar, Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau Patna Zone Unit

Patna HC15 Jun 2020CR. MISC./670/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Granting regular bail to the petitioner, a professional driver, pending the framing of charges in an NDPS case where ganja was recovered from the vehicle he was driving.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted subject to framing of charge upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

What the court decided

Mahendra Saw Vs Union of India through Dhiraj Kumar… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.670 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MAHENDRA SAW Son of Late Sita Ram Saw Resident of Village- Kala Diara, P.S.- Salimpur, District- Patna, Bihar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DHIRAJ KUMAR, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU PATNA ZONE UNIT Karpoori Thakur Sadan CGO Complex, D- and E Block, Ashiyana- Digha Road, Patna-25, Bihar.

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

¶13

4 15-06-2020 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

Counsel for the Union of India, through video conferencing.

¶15

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

¶16

Special Case No. 05 of 2019, arising out of F. No. NCB/PZU/V/03/2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 11.01.2019, the Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna, intercepted one blue-coloured Hundai car, without registration number, and recovered 30.75 kgs. of Ganja from the dickey of the said car. It has further been alleged that the petitioner was found driving the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.670 of 2020(4) dt.15-06-2020 2/3

¶19

car, in which four persons were sitting.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and the petitioner is a professional driver, who was hired by the accused persons. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and contraband material has not been recovered from his conscious possession. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.01.2019.

¶21

On the other hand, learned Counsel for the Union of India opposes the prayer for bail and submits that huge quantity of Ganja has been recovered from the car, which was being driven by the petitioner.

¶22

On the last occasion, a report was called for from the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XX –cum- Special Judge, NDPS Act, Patna, regarding the stage of the case and in pursuance thereof, a report has been submitted on 05.06.2020, by learned Additional Sessions Judge-XX –cum- Special Judge, NDPS Act, Patna, vide letter no. 38, stating therein that the case is listed for hearing on the point of framing of charge and out of six accused persons, four are in custody, including the petitioner, and two are absconding and for the absconded accused, a separate trial has been initiated.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.670 of 2020(4) dt.15-06-2020 3/3

¶24

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 12.01.2019, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner subject to framing of charge against the petitioner.

¶25

Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, after framing of charge, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-XX –cum- Special Judge, NDPS Act, Patna, in connection with of Special Case No. 05 of 2019, arising out of F. No. NCB/PZU/V/03/2019.

¶26

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bonds, all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding social distancing.

¶27

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶28

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶29

U √ T √

Mahendra Saw v. Union of India through Dhiraj Kumar, Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau Patna Zone Unit

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mahendra Saw v. Union of India through Dhiraj Kumar, Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau Patna Zone Unit

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lavkush Sah @ Lavkush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sankar Kumar Yadav @ Shiv Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sagar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Mini Naresh @ Mini Down Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Yadav @ Amarjeet Yadav Vs The State of Bihar