Petitioner sought withdrawal of anticipatory bail application as he had been arrested during its pendency. Court granted permission to withdraw, leading to dismissal of the application.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11619 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-873 Year-2019 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran
====================================================== Lavkush Sah @ Lavkush Kumar, aged about 30 years (M), son of Late Bhagwan Sah, resident of village- Raghunathpur Ward No. 5, P.S.Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this anticipatory bail application, the petitioner has been arrested and as such, this application has become infructuous. Accordingly, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-
U T
Lavkush Sah
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
