Allowed

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jan 2020CR. MISC./4750/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No.4750 of 2020, Justice Mohit Kumar Shah granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The court considered the charge of kidnapping and the petitioner's clean antecedents before ordering a bail bond. The direction was for release within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on Rs. 10,000/- bond with two sureties of the same amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Begusarai.

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4750 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2019 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PINTU KUMAR Son of Arvind Mahto Resident of Village- Baharbanni (Baba Sthan), P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-01-2020

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Birpur PS case no. 127 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A)/34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The allegation is regarding the petitioner having kidnapped the victim girl.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and is having a clean antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the statement of the victim girl made under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate to show that the victim girl had voluntarily fled away

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4750 of 2020(2) dt.23-01-2020 2/2

¶18

with the petitioner and solemnized marriage with him, as also has referred to the report of the Medical Board, which has shown the age of the petitioner to be more than 19 years.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it fit and appropriate to admit the petitioner to the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Begusarai in connection with Birpur PS case no. 127 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶21

rinkee/- U T

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bideshi Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dinesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Mahendra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Vidya Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Renu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sadanand Vishwas Vs The State of Bihar