Allowed

Dhanjee Mushar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2020CR. MISC./3340/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge bench of the High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners apprehending arrest in a prohibition case involving recovery of Mahua liquor. The court directed surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to surrender within six weeks; to be enlarged on bail upon production of bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions under section 438(2) CrPC.

Dhanjee Mushar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3340 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2017 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhanjee Mushar Son of Ramjee Ram Resident of Village - Raghunathpur Dakhini Mushari Tola, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar

¶5

Ramawatar Mushar @ Ram Awatar Ram Mushar Son of Nand Jee Ram Resident of Village - Raghunathpur Dakhini Mushari Tola, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Asha Kumari ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 05-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No.410 of 2017 registered for the offence under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

As per allegation in the F.I.R, on a raid being conducted it is stated that 10 litres of Mahua liquor was recovered from the house of petitioner no.1 and 1 litre of Mahua liquor was recovered from the house of petitioner no.2.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3340 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2020 2/2

¶18

the allegations of recovery is false and concocted. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by order dated 19.11.2019 passed in Cr.Misc. No.65790 of 2019.

¶19

The application for bail has been opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in the facts and circumstances of the case especially in view of the fact that similarly co-accused having been granted bail and petitioners have no criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No.410 of 2017 they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000.- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.II cum Special Judge, Excise, Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code.

¶21

Bibhash/- U T

Dhanjee Mushar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanjee Mushar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Funtush Khatik @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Vikash Jai Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Raj Ballam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Rishideo Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ Subham Kumar Vs The State of Bihar