Shiv Murat Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed as infructuous because the sole petitioner was arrested during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29456 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2020 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
SHIV MURAT SINGH Son of Late Mishri Singh Resident of Village - Bhaluhi, P.S.- Mohania, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 15-12-2020
Heard Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mrs. Sharda Kumari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this application, the sole petitioner has been arrested and the application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
perwez
U T
SHIV MURAT SINGH
The State of Bihar
ANIL KUMAR SINHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court