Criminal Miscellaneous application dismissed as infructuous because the sole petitioner had been arrested during its pendency, rendering the application no longer viable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29440 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-408 Year-2019 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran
======================================================
MUKESH SAH Son of Videshi Sah Resident of Village - Rasmandal, P.S.Pipra, District - East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this application, the sole petitioner has been arrested and the application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
perwez
U T
Mukesh Sah
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
