Allowed

Rajesh Kumar Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jan 2020CR. MISC./2810/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner pending framing of charge in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 involving liquor possession. Bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with sureties and specific conditions were ordered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Rajesh Kumar Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2810 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJESH KUMAR MUKHIYA Son of Late Kamaleshwar Mukhiya Residence of Village - Halkhori, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Jaleswar, District - Mahottari (Nepal)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Meena Singh, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 22-01-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

31.500 litres of Nepali liquor was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 12.10.2019.

¶15

Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of charge so that trial may not hamper, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2810 of 2020(2) dt.22-01-2020 2/2

¶17

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with G.O. Case No. 129 of 2019 with following conditions:

¶18

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶19

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶20

¶21

The trial Court is directed to expedite framing of the charge.

¶22

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶23

mantreshwar/-

¶24

U T

Rajesh Kumar Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Jatashankar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Bharti @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar