Allowed

Chandan Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2020CR. MISC./26881/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition regarding Sections 365/366A IPC, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner. The court relied on the victim's statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. indicating the marriage occurred by her free will. The petitioner was released on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the like amount.

Chandan Sahu Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26881 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2020 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Sahu aged about 20 years [male] s/o- Dinesh Sahu @ Dinesh Sah Residence of Vill - Banduhli, P.S - Baheri Distt - Darbhanga.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Pratibha Kumari aged about 18 years [Female] W/O Chandan Sahu D/oShiv Narayan Mandal R/O -Vill - Banduhli, P.S - Baheri Distt - Darbhanga.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kedar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 10-12-2020 Heard Mr. Kedar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned counsel appearing for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 47 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 365 / 366 (A) / 34 of the I.P.C.

¶14

The allegation as per the First Information Report is that the petitioner abducted the minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and there was love affair between the victim girl and the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26881 of 2020(4) dt.10-12-2020 2/3

¶17

petitioner. Referring to the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. learned counsel further submits that the victim girl in her statement has categorically stated that she had gone with the petitioner on her own free will and has performed marriage with him in temple at Darbhanga. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2020.

¶18

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State referring to the case diary submits that though the victim girl has not stated anything against the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. but the victim is minor and charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner under Section 366A of the I.P.C. and under the Child Marriage Act.

¶19

Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record , the fact that the victim girl has not stated anything against the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2020, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26881 of 2020(4) dt.10-12-2020 3/3

¶22

(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate IX, Darbhanga / court concerned in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 47 of 2020.

¶23

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bond all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding social distancing.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

praful/-

¶26

U T

Chandan Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pravesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Triloki Sharma @ Triloki Nath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Amrendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Saukhi @ Saukhi Pandit @ Sowkhi Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Surendra Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Sandip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar