Partly allowed

Amrendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2020CR. MISC./26354/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order in a criminal miscellaneous petition addresses the withdrawal of anticipatory bail for the first petitioner due to his arrest. The court then exercises its discretion to grant anticipatory bail to the second petitioner, citing co-villager status, land dispute, and injury severity, subject to social distancing during bond deposit.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner no. 2 with a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two like sureties, subject to social distancing guidelines.

Amrendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26354 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2019 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AMRENDRA KUMAR Son of Krishna Dubey Resident of Village - Goreakothi, P.S.- Goreakothi, District - Siwan, Bihar

¶5

Manish Kumar @ Aditya Ranjan Son of Krishna Dubey Male 20 years, Resident of Village - Goreakothi, P.S.- Goreakothi, District - Siwan, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kant, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesha Nand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 09-12-2020

¶12

Heard Mr. Mukesh Kant, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Naresh Prasad, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Umesha Nand Pandit, Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of this application, petitioner no.1. AMRENDRA KUMAR has been arrested. As such, this application for anticipatory bail filed on his behalf has become infructuous. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant application against petitioner no. 1. AMRENDRA KUMAR.

¶14

Permission is accorded. The application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioner no. 1. AMRENDRA KUMAR stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶15

The remaining petitioner no. 2 apprehends his arrest in

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26354 of 2020(3) dt.09-12-2020 2/3

¶17

connection with Goreakothi PS Case No. 210/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 325, 308/34 of the IPC.

¶18

The allegation, as per First Information Report, is that the petitioner assaulted informant, his brother and the son of informant by means of Lathi, Danda etc.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are co-villagers and there is land dispute between them. Learned counsel further submits that a counter case has also been lodged by the petitioner by way of complaint against the informant and others on 31.01.2020. Learned counsel, referring to the injury report which has been filed by way of supplementary affidavit, submits that all the injuries, caused to the victims, have been found to be simple in nature except one injury, on the fore-arm of one Prabhunath Prasad, has been found grievous in nature which is not on the vital part of the body.

¶20

On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant, vehemently, opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.2 and submits that all the accused persons including petitioner no.2 have assaulted the informant, his son and his brother and three persons have received injuries and one injury received by one Prabhunath Prasad is grievous in nature. Learned counsel further submits that the occurrence took place on 15.12.2019 but the counter case by way of complaint has been filed by the side of the petitioners

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26354 of 2020(3) dt.09-12-2020 3/3

¶22

after a considerable delay i.e., on 31.01.2020.

¶23

Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that both the parties are co-villagers and there is a land dispute between them and all the injuries caused to the victims are simple in nature except one grievous injury, caused to Prabhunath Prasad on his forearm which is a non vital part of the body, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.2.

¶24

Accordingly, petitioner no. 2, namely, MANISH KUMAR @ ADITYA RANJAN shall be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Goreakothi PS Case No. 210/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) CrPC.

¶25

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bonds all the parties shall follow the guidelines of social distancing.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

perwez

¶28

U T

Amrendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Pradeep Yadav @ Pradip Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kora Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Das Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Triloki Sharma @ Triloki Nath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Manjhi @ Dilip Kumar Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar