Allowed

Arvind Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jun 2020CR. MISC./17083/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order granting bail to a petitioner accused of kidnapping for ransom. The court noted the petitioner has no criminal record, investigation is complete, and there is no material suggesting tampering with evidence or hampering the trial. Bail is granted onRs.20,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Arvind Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17083 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-747 Year-2019 Thana- BIHARSHARIF District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARVIND KUMAR, Son of Naresh Prasad, Resident of village - Noawa and P.S. - Ashthwan, Dist. - Nawada.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 03-06-2020

¶7

The matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶9

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2019. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. FIR relating to offence of kidnapping of the son of the informant for ransom is against unknown. After recovery, the victim alleges that some others were kidnapper, however, during the period of his captivity, he was shifted on a car to some other place and petitioner was driver of that car.

¶11

Considering the completion of investigation of the case against the petitioner, remoteness of allegation and the fact that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no material

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17083 of 2020(2) dt.03-06-2020 2/2

¶13

to substantiate that the petitioner is going to tamper with the evidence or hamper the trial, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bihar Police Station Case No. 747 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:-

¶14

(a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶15

(b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

¶16

¶17

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lockdown, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

¶18

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶19

Kundan/-

¶20

U T

Arvind Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikky Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Satya Narayan Ram Vs The State of Bihar