Allowed

Hareram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jun 2020CR. MISC./19249/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

During the COVID-19 lockdown, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for recovery of liquor. The court directed release on personal bond subject to furnishing security and sureties once normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond; to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks after normalcy.

Hareram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19249 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2019 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HARERAM YADAV Son of Pundeo Yadav Resident of Village - Bera Parsauni, P.S.- Natuan, District- West Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amarendra Prasad ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 02-06-2020

¶14

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶15

taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The matter has been listed under the heading “For Orders” under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶19

The prosecution case, in short, is that 15 liters wine is recovered.

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 02-09-2019. Charge sheet/Prosecution report in this case has already been

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19249 of 2020(2) dt.02-06-2020 2/2

¶22

submitted. It is alleged that 15 liters wine is recovered. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶23

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶24

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 277 of 2019.

¶25

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

A.K.V.//-

¶28

U T

Hareram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hareram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anthu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bishambher Das Vs the State of Bihar

Kailash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Sonar Vs the State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Seraj @ Md. Siraj Vs The State of Bihar